Challenge 39

Tat-Fit

Launched Awarded Completed

This Challenge aims to develop a method that allows tamoxifen to be added to rodent chow without changing its palatability or consumption by the animals. The method must not alter the nutritional value of the food and the final product must be affordable and permit the addition of tamoxifen to the food by researchers and animal care staff.

Challenges briefing webinar

View the Challenges briefing webinar recording to find out more about this Challenge.

 

Challenge launched

Sponsored by the Mary Lyon Centre this Challenge aims to develop a method that allows tamoxifen to be added to rodent chow without changing its palatability or consumption by the animals. The method must not alter the nutritional value of the food and the final product must be affordable and permit the addition of tamoxifen to the food by researchers and animal care staff.

Background and 3Rs benefits

Conditional inducible transgenesis is widely used in mice to temporally and spatially express or delete genes using CRE recombinase (CRE-ER) (Kim et al., 2018). Induced by the application of the drug tamoxifen, CRE-ER proteins translocate into the nucleus of cells expressing them, leading to recombination at specific Lox P sites flanking the fragment of DNA to be excised.

The CRE system has been widely used to study the function of genes either at specific life stages or in specific tissue types at controlled time points. Although this targeted and inducible transgenesis can help to avoid the lethality caused by some global knockouts where the gene of interest is deleted in every cell in the mouse, the use of tamoxifen can be problematic.

Rodent diet containing tamoxifen is commercially available. The bitter taste of tamoxifen however means that it is not readily consumed by the mice and this can lead to weight loss. Unpalatability can also cause variability in the experimental cohort and confounds findings with the animal ingesting varying amounts of the food and hence tamoxifen. As a result, experiments usually require direct administration of tamoxifen by oral gavage which requires repeated handling and scruffing of the mice and insertion of a gavage cannula, with dosing typically for seven days. This can be highly time consuming for staff. Some facilities administer the compound either intraperitoneally or subcutaneously and this can lead to inflammation at the injection site as tamoxifen is hydrophobic and must be prepared in oil, typically corn oil. For studies involving pregnant mice, dosing particularly by the intraperitoneal route can result in spontaneous abortions.

Tamoxifen preparations can be variable depending on the source and approximately 10% of batches (data from the Mary Lyon Centre) have an adverse effect that results in the animals being removed from the study. The number of animals used is influenced by the challenges associated with effectively administering tamoxifen and the genotype required for the experiment. Some experiments use 192 mice with around 500 mice used in the associated breeding. Improved dosing could minimise the overall number of mice used.

This Challenge aims to deliver a palatable form of tamoxifen that can be prepared within a facility, using the required feed for the experiment. Providing food which contains tamoxifen but is otherwise indistinguishable for the animal will ensure that normal intake is maintained, reducing potential welfare concerns from lack of food and reducing dose variability. This will lead to more consistent recombinase activity, decreasing the variability of the phenotyping data yielded from such experiments, and resulting in a reduction in the number of animals used.

Other benefits

Many drugs are unpalatable, hence the widespread use of tablets in human medicine. It is not possible to dose small rodents with capsules or tablets, therefore any developed method which could potentially be applied in any facility and to any drug would be a significant advantage to the fields of preclinical medicine as well as discovery science (Turner et al., 2011).

Full Challenge information

PDF - 105.7 KB

PDF - 31.23 KB

Assessment information

Review Panel membership

Name Institution
Dr Malcolm Skingle (Chair) GSK
Dr Sara Wells (Sponsor) MRC Harwell - Mary Lyon Centre
Dr Michelle Stewart (Sponsor) MRC Harwell - Mary Lyon Centre
Professor Khuloud Al-Jamal KCL
Professor Joshua Boateng University of Greenwich
Mr James Bussell University of Oxford
Dr Sue Dunkerton KTN
Professor Alexandar Mullen University of Strathclyde 
Professor Michael Stocks University of Nottingham