Bibliography to support the adoption of 3Rs approaches in biologics quality control testing
A collection of key peer-reviewed research papers providing the scientific evidence base and methodological details necessary to enable the biologicals community to apply 3Rs approaches for the quality control and batch release testing of biological products with confidence.
Providing evidence of the robustness and reliability of 3Rs approaches for quality control and batch release testing was highlighted during our stakeholder engagement activities as a key requirement for the biologicals community to apply these approaches confidently. This bibliography has been developed to help overcome the scientific and technical barriers that affect the uptake of 3Rs methods, enabling the more widespread adoption of novel testing strategies.
On this page
How to use the bibliography
The five sections below reflect the broad testing categories most commonly identified during the review of WHO testing guidelines. We have also included a ‘General’ section that provides the wider context for the 3Rs in quality control and batch release testing.
- Publications under each category can be accessed by clicking on the category name in the list of page contents above.
- To return to the top of the page, use the up arrow in the grey circle in the bottom right corner of the page.
- To search the bibliography more specifically, for example by product type (e.g. poliovirus) or specific test/assay (e.g. monocyte activation test), use the ‘Ctrl+F’ keyboard shortcut.
General support for taking a 3Rs approach
Hoefnagel M et al, (2023). Rational arguments for regulatory acceptance of consistency testing: benefits of non-animal testing over in vivo release testing of vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines 22(1): 369–377. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2198601
Lilley E et al. (2023). Integrating 3Rs approaches in WHO guidelines for the batch release testing of biologicals: Responses from a survey of National Control Laboratories and National Regulatory Authorities. Biologicals 84: 101721 10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101721
Dierick J-F et al, (2022). The consistency approach for the substitution of in vivo testing for the quality control of established vaccines: practical considerations and progressive vision. Open Res Europe 2: 116. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15077.2
Lilley E et al. (2022). Integrating 3Rs approaches in WHO guidelines for the batch release testing of biologicals: Responses from a survey of vaccines and biological therapeutics manufacturers. Biologicals 81: 101660 10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.11.002
Saint-Raymond A et al, (2022). Reliance is key to effective access and oversight of medical products in case of public health emergencies. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 15(7): 805-810. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2088503
Lilley E et al. (2021). Integrating 3Rs approaches in WHO guidelines for the batch release testing of biologicals. Biologicals 74: 24-27 10.1016/j.biologicals.2021.10.002
Akkermans A et al, (2020). Animal testing for vaccines. Implementing replacement, reduction and refinement: challenges and priorities. Biologicals 68: 92-107. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.07.010
Cuff P and Woods A (2019). Regulating Medicines in a Globalized World: The Need for Increased Reliance Among Regulators. National Academies Press (US). doi: 10.17226/25594.2020.
Uhlrich S et al, (2018). 3Rs in Quality Control of Human Vaccines: Opportunities and Barriers. In: Kojima, H., Seidle, T., Spielmann, H. (eds) Alternatives to Animal Testing. Springer, Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2447-5_10
Bruysters M et al, (2017). Drivers and barriers in the consistency approach for vaccine batch release testing: Report of an international workshop. Biologicals 48: Pages 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.06.006
Schutte K et al, (2017). Modern science for better quality control of medicinal products "Towards global harmonization of 3Rs in biologicals": The report of an EPAA workshop. Biologicals 48: Pages 55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.05.006
Hendriksen C et al, (2008). The consistency approach for the quality control of vaccines. Biologicals 36(1): 73-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2007.05.002
Halder M (2001). Three Rs potential in the development and quality control of immunobiologicals. Altex 18 Suppl 1: 13-47. PMID: 11854853
Pyrogenicity and endotoxin testing
Thurman T et al, (2023). Comparison of pyrogen assays by testing products exhibiting low endotoxin recovery. ALTEX 40(1):117-124. doi: 10.14573/altex.2202021
Charton E (2022). European Pharmacopoeia Approach to Testing for Pyrogenicity. American Pharmaceutical Review July/August 2022. Link to article: https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com
Etna M et al, (2022). Optimization of the monocyte activation test for evaluating pyrogenicity of tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccine. ALTEX 37(4): 532-544. doi: 10.14573/altex.2002252
Tindall B et al, (2021). Recombinant bacterial endotoxin testing: a proven solution. Bio Techniques 70(5): 290-300. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0165
Hartung T (2021). Pyrogen testing revisited on occasion of the 25th anniversary of the whole blood monocyte activation test. ALTEX 38(1): 3-19. doi: 10.14573/altex.2101051
Bolden et al, (2020). Currently Available Recombinant Alternatives to Horseshoe Crab Blood Lysates: Are They Comparable for the Detection of Environmental Bacterial Endotoxins? A Review. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 274(5): 602-611. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012187
Gorman R (2020). Atlantic Horseshoe Crabs and Endotoxin Testing: Perspectives on Alternatives, sustainable Methods, and the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement). Front Mar Sci 30(7): 1-11. doi: 10.3389%2Ffmars.2020.582132
Piehler et al, (2020). Comparison of LAL and rFC Assays-Participation in a Proficiency Test Program between 2014 and 2019. Microorganisms 8(3):418 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030418
Vipond C et al, (2019). Development and validation of a monocyte activation test for the control/safety testing of an OMV-based meningococcal B vaccine. Vaccine 37(29): 3747-3753. dio: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.038
Kirfalusi-Gannon J et al, (2018). The Role of Horseshoe Crabs in the Biomedical Industry and Recent Trends Impacting Species Sustainability. Front Mar Sci 05: 1-13. dio: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00185
Bolden J and Smith K (2017). Application of Recombinant Factor C Reagent for the Detection of Bacterial Endotoxins in Pharmaceutical Products. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 71(5): 405-412 dio: 10.5731/pdajpst.2017.007849
Fennrich S et al, (2016). More than 70 years of pyrogen detection: Current state and future perspectives. Altern Lab Anim 44(3): 239-53. dio: 10.1177/026119291604400305
Schindler S et al, (2009). Development, validation and applications of the monocyte activation test for pyrogens based on human whole blood. ALTEX 26(4): 265-277. dio: 10.14573/altex.2009.4.265
Ding J and Ho B (2001). A new era in pyrogen testing. Trends Biotechnol 19(8): 277-81. dio: 10.1016/s0167-7799(01)01694-8
Neurovirulence testing
Konz J et al, (2021). Evaluation and validation of next-generation sequencing to support lot release for a novel type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine. Vaccine X 8: 100102 doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100102
May Fulton C and Bailey W (2021). Live Viral Vaccine Neurovirulence Screening: Current and Future Models. Vaccines (Basel) 9(7):710. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9070710
Charlton B et al, (2020). The Use of Next-Generation Sequencing for the Quality Control of Live-Attenuated Polio Vaccines. J Infect Dis 222(11):1920-1927. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa299
da Costa A et al, (2018). Innovative in cellulo method as an alternative to in vivo neurovirulence test for the characterization and quality control of human live Yellow Fever virus. Biologicals 53:19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.03.004
Wood D (1999). Neurovirulence. Dev Biol Stand 101:127-9. PMID: 10566785
Horie H et al, (1998). Estimation of the neurovirulence of poliovirus by non-radioisotope molecular analysis to quantify genomic changes. Biologicals 26(4): 289-97. doi: 10.1006/biol.1998.0159
Chumakov K et al, (1993). Assessment of the viral RNA sequence heterogeneity for control of OPV neurovirulence. Dev Biol Stand 78:79-89. PMID: 8388834
Adventitious agents testing
Barone P et al, (2023). Historical evaluation of the in vivo adventitious virus test and its potential for replacement with next generation sequencing (NGS). Biologicals 81:101661. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.11.003
Morris C et al, (2021). Adventitious agent detection methods in bio-pharmaceutical applications with a focus on viruses, bacteria, and mycoplasma. Curr Opin Biotechnol 71:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.06.027
Charlebois R et al, (2020). Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection. npj Vaccines 5: 61. doi: 10.1038/s41541-020-0207-4
Khan A et al, (2020). Report of the second international conference on next generation sequencing for adventitious virus detection in biologics for humans and animals. Biologicals 67: 94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002
Pennings J et al, (2020). A next-generation sequencing based method for determining genetic stability in Clostridium tetani vaccine strains. Biologicals 64: 10-14. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.02.001
Gombold J et al, (2014). Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products. Vaccine 32(24): 2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021
Potency testing
Iwaki M et al, (2023). An ELISA system for tetanus toxoid potency tests: An alternative to lethal challenge. Biologicals 82:101681 doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101681
Tedcastle R et al, (2022). Report on the WHO collaborative study to establish Universal Reagents for the D-Antigen potency testing of Inactivated Polio Vaccines. Link to article: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-bs-2022.2432
Vandebriel R et al, (2022). Development of a cell line-based in vitro assay for assessment of Diphtheria, Tetanus and acellular Pertussis (DTaP)-induced inflammasome activation. Vaccine 40(38): 5601-5607. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.022
Riches-Duit R et al, (2021). Characterisation of diphtheria monoclonal antibodies as a first step towards the development of an in vitro vaccine potency immunoassay. Biologicals. 69: 38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.12.002
Riches-Duit R et al, (2021). Characterisation of tetanus monoclonal antibodies as a first step towards the development of an in vitro vaccine potency immunoassay. Biologicals. 71: 31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2021.04.002
Signorazzi A et al, (2021). In vitro assessment of tick-borne encephalitis vaccine: Suitable human cell platforms and potential biomarkers. ALTEX 38(3): 431-441. doi: 10.14573/altex.2010081
Stalpers C et al, (2021). Variability of in vivo potency tests of Diphtheria, Tetanus and acellular Pertussis (DTaP) vaccines. Vaccine. 39(18): 2506-2516. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.078
Ticha O et al, (2021). A cell-based in vitro assay for testing of immunological integrity of Tetanus toxoid vaccine antigen. NPJ Vaccines 6: 88. 10.1038%2Fs41541-021-00344-1
Imura A et al, (2020). Development of an Enterovirus 71 Vaccine Efficacy Test Using Human Scavenger Receptor B2 Transgenic Mice. J Virol 94(6):e01921-19. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01921-19
Kouiavskaia D et al, (2020). Universal ELISA for quantification of D-antigen in inactivated poliovirus vaccines. Journal of Virological Methods 276: 113785. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113785
Michiels T et al, (2020). Degradomics-Based Analysis of Tetanus Toxoids as a Quality Control Assay. Vaccines 8(4): 712. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040712
Rajam G et al, (2019). Development and validation of a robust multiplex serological assay to quantify antibodies specific to pertussis antigens. Biologicals 57: 9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.11.001
Morgeaux S et al, (2018). Replacement of in vivo human rabies vaccine potency testing by in vitro glycoprotein quantification using ELISA - Results of an international collaborative study. Vaccine 35(6): 966-971. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.039
Chabaud-Riou M et al, (2017). G-protein based ELISA as a potency test for rabies vaccines. Biologicals 46: 124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.02.002
Byung-Chul K et al, (2016). A collaborative study of an alternative in vitro potency assay for the Japanese encephalitis vaccine. Virus Res 223: 190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.07.012
Chacón F et al, (2015). The lethality test used for estimating the potency of antivenoms against Bothrops asper snake venom: pathophysiological mechanisms, prophylactic analgesia, and a surrogate in vitro assay. Toxicon 93: 41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.11.223
Ma S et al, (2014). Development of a sandwich ELISA for the quantification of enterovirus 71. Cytotechnology 66(3): 413–418. doi: 10.1007%2Fs10616-013-9588-9
Morgeaux S et al, (2013). Validation of a new ELISA method for in vitro potency testing of hepatitis A vaccines. Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes 2013: 64-92. PMID: 24447723
He F et al, (2013). Development of a sensitive and specific epitope-blocking ELISA for universal detection of antibodies to human enterovirus 71 strains. PLoS One 8(1):e55517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055517
Descamps J et al, (2011). A case study of development, validation, and acceptance of a non-animal method for assessing human vaccine potency. Procedia in Vaccinology 5: 184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.018
Poirier B et al, (2010). Would an in vitro ELISA test be a suitable alternative potency method to the in vivo immunogenicity assay commonly used in the context of international Hepatitis A vaccines batch release? Vaccine 28(7): 1796-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.006
Kumar S et al, (2009). Standardization and validation of Vero cell assay for potency estimation of diphtheria antitoxin serum. Biologicals 37(5): 297-305, doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.05.002
von Hunolstein C et al, (2008). Evaluation of two serological methods for potency testing of whole cell pertussis vaccines. Pharmeuropa Bio. 2008(1): 7-18. PMID: 19220977
Winsnes R et al, (2006). Collaborative Study for the Validation of Serological Methods for Potency Testing of Diphtheria Toxoid Vaccines - Part 2. Link to article: https://www.edqm.eu/documents/52006/123862/bsp034-p2-dserol.pdf
Shank-Retzlaff M et al, (2005). Correlation between Mouse Potency and In Vitro Relative Potency for Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Virus-Like Particles and Gardasil® Vaccine Samples. Human Vaccines 1(5): 191-197. doi: 10.4161/hv.1.5.2126
Sesardic D et al, (2003). Collaborative Study for the Validation of Serological Methods for Potency Testing of Diphtheria Toxoid Vaccines Extended Study: Correlation of Serology with in vivo Toxin Neutralisation. Link to article: https://www.edqm.eu/documents/52006/123862/bsp034-p1-ext-dserol.pdf
Poirier B et al, (2000). In Vitro Potency Assay for Hepatitis A Vaccines: Development of a Unique Economical Test. Biologicals Volume 28, Issue 4, December 2000, Pages 247-256. 10.1006/biol.2001.0264
Safety testing
Viviani L et al, (2022). Accelerating Global Deletion of the Abnormal Toxicity Test for vaccines and biologicals. Planning common next steps. A workshop Report. Biologicals 78: 17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.06.003
Viviani L et al, (2020). Global harmonization of vaccine testing requirements: Making elimination of the ATT and TABST a concrete global achievement. Biologicals 63: 101-105. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2019.10.007
Wagner L et al, (2017). Towards replacement of the acellular pertussis vaccine safety test: Comparison of in vitro cytotoxic activity and in vivo activity in mice. Vaccine 35(51): 7160-7165. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.082
Arciniega J et al, (2016). Alternatives to HIST for acellular pertussis vaccines: progress and challenges in replacement. Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes 2015: 82–96. PMID: 27506225
Dazhi J et al, (2016). Quantitative Detection of Vibrio cholera Toxin by Real-Time and Dynamic Cytotoxicity Monitoring. J Clin Microbiol 51(12) doi: 10.1128/jcm.01959-13
Behrensdorf-Nicol H et al, (2015). "BINACLE" assay for in vitro detection of active tetanus neurotoxin in toxoids. ALTEX 32(2): 137-42. doi: 10.14573/altex.1412181
Xing D et al, (2014). Whole-cell pertussis vaccine potency assays: the Kendrick test and alternative assays. Expert Review of Vaccines 13(10): 1175–1182. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2014.939636
Isbrucker R et al, (2013). Transferability study of CHO cell clustering assays for monitoring of pertussis toxin activity in acellular pertussis vaccines. Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes. 2015: 97-114. PMID: 27506252
Corbel M and Xing D (2004). Toxicity and potency evaluation of pertussis vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 3(1): 89-101. doi: 10.1586/14760584.3.1.89
McKenna A et al, (1995). Attenuated typhoid vaccine Salmonella typhi Ty21a: fingerprinting and quality control. Microbiology 141(8): 1993-2002. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-8-1993
See our project page for more information and to access related publications.