349 results
WHO guideline title | Product | TRS | Test name | Test category | 3Rs approach | Toggle to view all updates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of BCG vaccines |
BCG vaccine
|
979 Annex 3
|
Delayed hypersensitivity test
|
Toxicity
|
||
Original textWhen a new working seed lot is established, a suitable test for delayed hypersensitivity in guinea-pigs is carried out; the vaccine is shown to be not significantly different in activity from the in-house reference. New textPropose no change here. Impact will be low because this test should be used infrequently.
|
||||||
Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of BCG vaccines |
BCG vaccine
|
979 Annex 3
|
Test for absence of virulent mycobacteria
|
Adventitious agents
|
NGS
Culture method
|
|
Original textThe test for absence of virulent mycobacteria, described in Part A, section 4.2.3, should be made in at least 10 healthy guinea-pigs injected with a quantity o fvaccine not less than 50 single human doses and should be observed for at least six weeks. If none of the animals shows signs of progressive TB and at least 90% survive the observation period (i.e. should one of the 10 animals die), the seed lot should be considered to be free from virulent mycobacteria. If more than 10% of the guinea-pigs die during the observation period (i.e. should two out of 10 animals die) and freedom from progressive TB disease is verified, the test should be repeated on at least 10 more guinea-pigs. On the second occasion, the seed lot passes the test if not more than 10% of the animals die during the observation period (i.e. should one of the 10 animals die) and the autopsy does not reveal any sign of TB. New textA test for the absence of virulent mycobacteria should be performed. Where available and appropriately validated, an in vitro test should be used (for example a validated nucleic acid amplification test or culture method). If in vitro assays are not available or appropriate, a suitable compendial in vivo test may be used.ReferencesBiologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
|
||||||
Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of BCG vaccines |
BCG vaccine
|
979 Annex 3
|
Test for excessive dermal reactivity
|
Toxicity
|
||
Original textThe test for excessive dermal reactivity, described in Part A, section 6.4.2, should be made in six healthy guinea-pigs, each weighing not less than 250 g and having received no treatment likely to interfere with the test. Each guineapig should be injected intradermally, according to a randomized plan, with 0.1 ml of the reconstituted vaccine and of vaccine dilutions 1:10 and 1:100. The same dilutions of the appropriate international Reference Reagent or in-house reference should be injected into the same guinea-pigs at randomly selected sites. The guinea-pigs should be observed for at least four weeks. The vaccine complies with the test if the reactions it produces at the sites of injection are not markedly different from those produced by the appropriate international Reference Reagent or in-house reference. New textA test for excessive dermal reactivity should be performed. Where available and appropriately validated, an in vitro test should be used. If in vitro assays are scientifically justified as unavailable and inappropriate, a suitable compendial in vivo test may be used. |
||||||
Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of BCG vaccines |
BCG vaccine
|
979 Annex 3
|
Test for absence of virulent mycobacteria
|
Toxicity
|
NGS
Cell culture method
|
|
Original textAt least six healthy guinea-pigs, all of the same sex, each weighing 250–400 g should be used. They should not have received any treatment or diet, such as antibiotics, that is likely to interfere with the test. A sample of the final bulk intended for this test should be stored at 4 °C for not more than 72 hours after harvest. A dose of BCG organisms corresponding to at least 50 single human doses of vaccine intended for intradermal injection should be injected into each guinea-pig by the subcutaneous or intramuscular route.1 The guinea-pigs should be observed for at least six weeks. If, during that time, they remain healthy, gain weight, show no signs of progressive TB and not more than one dies, the final bulk should be considered to be free from virulent mycobacteria. New textA test for the absence of virulent mycobacteria should be performed. Where available and appropriately validated, an in vitro test should be used (for example a validated nucleic acid amplification test or cell culture method). If in vitro assays are scientifically justified as unavailable and inappropriate, a suitable compendial in vivo test may be used.ReferencesBiologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
|
||||||
Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of BCG vaccines |
BCG vaccine
|
979 Annex 3
|
Test for absence of virulent mycobacteria
|
Toxicity
|
NGS
Cell culture method
|
|
Original textProvided the test for virulent mycobacteria has been carried out with satisfactory results on the final bulk vaccine, it may be omitted on the final lot. If the test for the absence of virulent mycobacteria, applied to the final bulk, is unsatisfactory (and freedom from progressive TB disease is verified), it should be repeated with a sample of a final lot (see Part A, section 4.2.3). New textA test for the absence of virulent mycobacteria should be performed. Where available and appropriately validated, an in vitro test should be used (for example a validated nucleic acid amplification test or cell culture method). If in vitro assays are scientifically justified as unavailable and inappropriate, a suitable in vivo test may be used.ReferencesBiologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
|
||||||
Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of BCG vaccines |
BCG vaccine
|
979 Annex 3
|
Test for excessive dermal reactivity
|
Toxicity
|
||
Original textProvided the test has been carried out with satisfactory results on the working seed lot and on at least three consecutive final lots produced from it, the test may be omitted on the final lot. New textKeep original text
|
||||||
Recommendations for Japanese encephalitis vaccine (inactivated) for human use (Revised 2007) |
Japanese Encephalitis vaccine - inactivated
|
963 Annex 1
|
Tests for adventitious agents
|
Adventitious agents
|
NGS
|
|
Original textIf the working virus seed lot is derived from mouse brain or primary cell cultures, it should be tested for adventitious agents as in section A.3.2.3.3. If working virus seed lots are produced in cells derived from a validated cell bank where a master virus seed lot was tested for adventitious agents, these tests do not have to be repeated. New textA strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.ReferencesBiologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
|
||||||
Recommendations for Japanese encephalitis vaccine (inactivated) for human use (Revised 2007) |
Japanese Encephalitis vaccine - inactivated
|
963 Annex 1
|
Test for virus content
|
Virus content
|
||
Original textA sample removed from each virus harvest should be tested for virus content using suitable methods approved by the national regulatory authority. Both mice and cell culture with defined sensitivity are suitable for testing infectivity. New textA sample removed from each virus harvest should be tested for virus content using suitable methods approved by the national regulatory authority. Cell culture methods with defined sensitivity are suitable for testing infectivity. |
||||||
Recommendations for Japanese encephalitis vaccine (inactivated) for human use (Revised 2007) |
Japanese Encephalitis vaccine - inactivated
|
963 Annex 1
|
Test for effective inactivation
|
Innactivation
|
||
Original textEach bulk suspension should be tested in an appropriate test system for effective inactivation of the virus before the addition of preservatives and other substances. The sensitivity of the assay should be determined according to the JE virus used for production and the most sensitive assay should be used. New textEach bulk suspension should be tested in an appropriate test system for effective inactivation of the virus before the addition of preservatives and other substances. The sensitivity of the assay should be determined according to the JE virus used for production and the most sensitive assay should be used. |
||||||
Recommendations for Japanese encephalitis vaccine (inactivated) for human use (Revised 2007) |
Japanese Encephalitis vaccine - inactivated
|
963 Annex 1
|
Test for pyrogenic substances
|
Pyrogenicity/endotooxin testing
|
MAT
rFC
|
|
Original textEach final lot should be tested for pyrogenic substances. The test procedures New textThe need for pyrogenicity testing should be assessed during the manufacturing development process and be re-evaluated following any significant changes in the production process or relevant reported production inconsistencies that may influence pyrogenicity. A risk-based approach should be implemented which is suitable to the manufacturing process and the product depending on the potential presence of endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens. The endotoxin content of the final product should be determined using a suitable in vitro assay, such as the recombinant factor C (rFC) or limulus/tachypleus amoebocyte lysate (LAL/TAL) tests. The rFC method is strongly recommended due to concerns over the impact on the sustainability of limulus stocks. The endotoxin content should be consistent with levels found to be acceptable in final product lots used in clinical trials and within the limits agreed upon with the NRA. A monocyte activation test (MAT) may be used for pyrogen testing after a product-specific validation. The use of the rabbit pyrogen test should be avoided due to its inherent variability, high retesting rates, and interspecies differences in pyrogenic responses as compared to humans.ReferencesMAT:Schindler, S., von Aulock, S., Daneshian, M. and Hartung, T. (2009) “Development, validation and applications of the monocyte activation test for pyrogens based on human whole blood”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 26(4), pp. 265–277. doi: 10.14573/altex.2009.4.265.
rFC: Biotechniques 2021 May;70(5):290-300. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0165. Epub 2021 May 6.
|