349 results
WHO guideline title | Product | TRS | Test name | Test category | 3Rs approach | Toggle to view all updates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs |
Rabies vaccine
|
941 Annex 2
|
General safety (innocuity) test
|
GST
|
||
Original textEach final lot should be tested for unexpected toxicity (sometimes called abnormal toxicity) using a general safety (innocuity) test approved by the national regulatory authority. This test may be omitted for routine lot release once consistency of production has been well established to the satisfaction of the national regulatory authority and when good manufacturing practices are in place. Each lot, if tested, should pass a test for general safety. New textThis needs to be removed as per WHO TRS 1016, 2019 page No 32-33
ReferencesBiologicals. 2020 Jul; 66: 17–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.05.003
|
||||||
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs |
Rabies vaccine
|
941 Annex 2
|
Potency test of vaccine in final containers
|
Potency
|
Immunochemical methods (ELISA with relevant Monoclonal antibodies detecting the conformational native glycoprotein. SRD is not a relevant method as the glycoprotein is destroyed), serologic test
|
|
Original textThe NIH test as described in Laboratory techniques in rabies (10) should be used to evaluate consistency of production of the vaccine in question. This should also be used to test product stability for the purpose of establishing shelf life as well as to calibrate reference preparations. In this test mice are immunized and subsequently challenged with rabies virus. The test is conducted by vaccinating groups of mice, on two occasions, 7 days apart, with dilutions of an appropriate reference material calibrated against the International Standard for Rabies Vaccine the and vaccine being tested. New textCurrently, in vitro assays (e.g. ELISA) have been developed or are under development and may be appropriate as a replacement to the in vivo assay for determination of potency. A quantitative in vitro test, approved by the NRA and using well-characterized antibodies, should be performed on each final vaccine lot. In vitro potency assays are preferred, however if an in vivo assay is carried out, it must be scientifically justified and should be approved by the NRA.ReferencesPh. Eur. - Rabies vaccine for human use monograph; Morgeaux S, Poirier B, Ragan CI, Wilkinson D, et al. Replacement of in vivo human rabies vaccine potency testing by in vitro glycoprotein quantification using ELISA - Results of an international collaborative study. Vaccine 2017 Jan 9. pii: S0264-410X(16)31264.
Link to Biologicals paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28214171/
Biologicals. 2017 Mar;46:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
G-protein based ELISA as a potency test for rabies vaccines
Martine Chabaud-Riou 1, Nadège Moreno 1, Fabien Guinchard 1, Marie Claire Nicolai 1, Elisabeth Niogret-Siohan 1, Nicolas Sève 1, Catherine Manin 2, Françoise Guinet-Morlot 1, Patrice Riou 1
|
||||||
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs |
Rabies vaccine
|
941 Annex 2
|
Test for pyrogenic substances
|
Pyrogenicity/endotooxin testing
|
MAT
rFC
|
|
Original textEach final lot should be tested for pyrogenic substances. The test should be New textThe need for pyrogenicity testing should be assessed during the manufacturing development process and be re-evaluated following any significant changes in the production process or relevant reported production inconsistencies that may influence pyrogenicity. A risk-based approach should be implemented which is suitable to the manufacturing process and the product depending on the potential presence of endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens. The endotoxin content of the final product should be determined using a suitable in vitro assay, such as the recombinant factor C (rFC) or limulus/tachypleus amoebocyte lysate (LAL/TAL) tests. The rFC method is strongly recommended due to concerns over the impact on the sustainability of limulus stocks. The endotoxin content should be consistent with levels found to be acceptable in final product lots used in clinical trials and within the limits agreed upon with the NRA. A monocyte activation test (MAT) may be used for pyrogen testing after a product-specific validation. The use of the rabbit pyrogen test should be avoided due to its inherent variability, high retesting rates, and interspecies differences in pyrogenic responses as compared to humans.ReferencesMAT:Schindler, S., von Aulock, S., Daneshian, M. and Hartung, T. (2009) “Development, validation and applications of the monocyte activation test for pyrogens based on human whole blood”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 26(4), pp. 265–277. doi: 10.14573/altex.2009.4.265.
rFC: Biotechniques 2021 May;70(5):290-300. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0165. Epub 2021 May 6.
|
||||||
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs |
Rabies vaccine
|
941 Annex 2
|
Tests for adventitious agents in suckling mice
|
Adventitious agents
|
NGS
Cell culture method
|
|
Original textA sample of the virus suspension should be tested for the presence of adventitious agents pathogenic to mice by intracerebral inoculation of 0.01 ml and intraperitoneal inoculation of at least 0.1 ml into at least 10 suckling mice. The mice should be less than 24 hours old and originate from more than one litter. They should be observed daily for at least 14 days. All mice that die within the first 24 hours following inoculation or that show signs of illness should be examined for evidence of viral infection. New textA strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.ReferencesBiologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
|
||||||
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs |
Rabies vaccine
|
941 Annex 2
|
Tests for adventitious agents in adult mice
|
Adventitious agents
|
NGS
Cell culture method
|
|
Original textA sample of the virus suspension should be tested for the presence of adventitious agents pathogenic to mice by intracerebral inoculation of 0.03 ml, intraperitoneal inoculation of at least 0.25 ml, and inoculation of 0.01 ml into the footpad in at least 20 adult mice, each weighing 15–20 g. The mice should be observed for at least 4 weeks. All mice that die within the fi rst 24 hours of inoculation or that show signs of illness should be examined for evidence of viral infection. New textA strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.ReferencesBiologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
|
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines |
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
|
1024 Annex 2
|
General manufacturing guidelines
|
n/a
|
||
Original textMoreover, whenever in vivo tests are performed during vaccine development or manufacturing, it is desirable for ethical reasons to apply the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) to minimize the use of animals where scientifically appropriate (97). New textMoreover, whenever in vivo tests are performed during vaccine development or manufacturing, it is desirable for both scientific and ethical reasons to apply the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) to minimize the use of animals where scientifically appropriate (97). |
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines |
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
|
1024 Annex 2
|
Tests for adventitious agents
|
Adventitious agents
|
NGS
Cell culture method
|
|
Original textEach virus MS lot should also be tested in animals if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides a risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package (103). The animals used might include guinea-pigs, adult mice and suckling mice. New textA strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.ReferencesBiologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
|
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines |
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
|
1024 Annex 2
|
Tests in experimental animals
|
Miscellaneous
|
||
Original textAs outlined in Part B below, studies should, when relevant, be performed in animals to determine that the MS virus displays attenuating features which are maintained throughout subsequent vaccine process steps. For certain candidate vaccines it may be required to test at least once during nonclinical development for these features in a relevant animal model. For an MS virus to be identified as attenuated the criteria for determining attenuation should be clearly defined. The NRA may decide that such testing does not need to be repeated each time a new WS lot is derived. New textKeep original text
|
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines |
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
|
1024 Annex 2
|
Tests for adventitious agents
|
Adventitious agents
|
NGS
Cell culture method
|
|
Original textEach recombinant baculovirus seed should be tested in cell cultures for adventitious agents appropriate to the origin and passage history of the seed baculovirus. New textA strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.ReferencesBiologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
|
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines |
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
|
1024 Annex 2
|
Genetic and phenotypic characterization
|
Miscellaneous
|
||
Original textFor replicating vectors, in vivo growth characteristics in a suitable animal model may also be informative and should be performed if justified. New textFor replicating vectors, growth characteristics in a suitable model may also be informative and should be performed if justified. |