Skip to main content

New funding scheme: £4M available for proposals to establish infrastructure needed to accelerate use of non-animal methods. Apply now.

NC3Rs | 20 Years: Pioneering Better Science

Review of animal use requirements in WHO biologics guidelines – database of suggested guideline revisions

This fully searchable database contains all of the animal tests and 3Rs language found in the WHO biologics guidelines reviewed during the project. For each entry in the database, the expert reviewers have made comments on the original text (in bold) and/or suggested revisions to promote adoption of specific 3Rs approaches where appropriate or to modify the language to facilitate adoption of 3Rs approaches in the future. More information about the review process can be found in the final report to WHO.

349 results

WHO guideline title Product TRS Test name Test category 3Rs approach Toggle to view all updates
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs
Rabies vaccine
941 Annex 2
General safety (innocuity) test
GST

Original text

Each final lot should be tested for unexpected toxicity (sometimes called abnormal toxicity) using a general safety (innocuity) test approved by the national regulatory authority. This test may be omitted for routine lot release once consistency of production has been well established to the satisfaction of the national regulatory authority and when good manufacturing practices are in place. Each lot, if tested, should pass a test for general safety.

New text

This needs to be removed as per WHO TRS 1016, 2019 page No 32-33
Year
2007
Page
107
Section
A.6.3

References

Biologicals. 2020 Jul; 66: 17–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.05.003
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs
Rabies vaccine
941 Annex 2
Potency test of vaccine in final containers
Potency
Immunochemical methods (ELISA with relevant Monoclonal antibodies detecting the conformational native glycoprotein. SRD is not a relevant method as the glycoprotein is destroyed), serologic test

Original text

The NIH test as described in Laboratory techniques in rabies (10) should be used to evaluate consistency of production of the vaccine in question. This should also be used to test product stability for the purpose of establishing shelf life as well as to calibrate reference preparations. In this test mice are immunized and subsequently challenged with rabies virus. The test is conducted by vaccinating groups of mice, on two occasions, 7 days apart, with dilutions of an appropriate reference material calibrated against the International Standard for Rabies Vaccine the and vaccine being tested.

New text

Currently, in vitro assays (e.g. ELISA) have been developed or are under development and may be appropriate as a replacement to the in vivo assay for determination of potency. A quantitative in vitro test, approved by the NRA and using well-characterized antibodies, should be performed on each final vaccine lot. In vitro potency assays are preferred, however if an in vivo assay is carried out, it must be scientifically justified and should be approved by the NRA.
Year
2007
Page
107
Section
A.6.5

References

Ph. Eur. - Rabies vaccine for human use monograph; Morgeaux S, Poirier B, Ragan CI, Wilkinson D, et al. Replacement of in vivo human rabies vaccine potency testing by in vitro glycoprotein quantification using ELISA - Results of an international collaborative study. Vaccine 2017 Jan 9. pii: S0264-410X(16)31264.
Link to Biologicals paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28214171/
Biologicals. 2017 Mar;46:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
G-protein based ELISA as a potency test for rabies vaccines
Martine Chabaud-Riou 1, Nadège Moreno 1, Fabien Guinchard 1, Marie Claire Nicolai 1, Elisabeth Niogret-Siohan 1, Nicolas Sève 1, Catherine Manin 2, Françoise Guinet-Morlot 1, Patrice Riou 1
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs
Rabies vaccine
941 Annex 2
Test for pyrogenic substances
Pyrogenicity/endotooxin testing
MAT
rFC

Original text

Each final lot should be tested for pyrogenic substances. The test should be
approved by the national regulatory authority.

New text

The need for pyrogenicity testing should be assessed during the manufacturing development process and be re-evaluated following any significant changes in the production process or relevant reported production inconsistencies that may influence pyrogenicity. A risk-based approach should be implemented which is suitable to the manufacturing process and the product depending on the potential presence of endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens. The endotoxin content of the final product should be determined using a suitable in vitro assay, such as the recombinant factor C (rFC) or limulus/tachypleus amoebocyte lysate (LAL/TAL) tests. The rFC method is strongly recommended due to concerns over the impact on the sustainability of limulus stocks. The endotoxin content should be consistent with levels found to be acceptable in final product lots used in clinical trials and within the limits agreed upon with the NRA. A monocyte activation test (MAT) may be used for pyrogen testing after a product-specific validation. The use of the rabbit pyrogen test should be avoided due to its inherent variability, high retesting rates, and interspecies differences in pyrogenic responses as compared to humans.
Year
2007
Page
110
Section
A.6.8

References

MAT:Schindler, S., von Aulock, S., Daneshian, M. and Hartung, T. (2009) “Development, validation and applications of the monocyte activation test for pyrogens based on human whole blood”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 26(4), pp. 265–277. doi: 10.14573/altex.2009.4.265.
rFC: Biotechniques 2021 May;70(5):290-300. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0165. Epub 2021 May 6.
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs
Rabies vaccine
941 Annex 2
Tests for adventitious agents in suckling mice
Adventitious agents
NGS
Cell culture method

Original text

A sample of the virus suspension should be tested for the presence of adventitious agents pathogenic to mice by intracerebral inoculation of 0.01 ml and intraperitoneal inoculation of at least 0.1 ml into at least 10 suckling mice. The mice should be less than 24 hours old and originate from more than one litter. They should be observed daily for at least 14 days. All mice that die within the first 24 hours following inoculation or that show signs of illness should be examined for evidence of viral infection.

New text

A strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.
Year
2007
Page
97
Section
A3.2.1.2.2

References

Biologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
Recommendations for inactivated rabies vaccine for human use produced in cell substrates and embryonated eggs
Rabies vaccine
941 Annex 2
Tests for adventitious agents in adult mice
Adventitious agents
NGS
Cell culture method

Original text

A sample of the virus suspension should be tested for the presence of adventitious agents pathogenic to mice by intracerebral inoculation of 0.03 ml, intraperitoneal inoculation of at least 0.25 ml, and inoculation of 0.01 ml into the footpad in at least 20 adult mice, each weighing 15–20 g. The mice should be observed for at least 4 weeks. All mice that die within the fi rst 24 hours of inoculation or that show signs of illness should be examined for evidence of viral infection.

New text

A strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.
Year
2007
Page
97
Section
A3.2.1.2.2

References

Biologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
1024 Annex 2
General manufacturing guidelines
n/a

Original text

Moreover, whenever in vivo tests are performed during vaccine development or manufacturing, it is desirable for ethical reasons to apply the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) to minimize the use of animals where scientifically appropriate (97).

New text

Moreover, whenever in vivo tests are performed during vaccine development or manufacturing, it is desirable for both scientific and ethical reasons to apply the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) to minimize the use of animals where scientifically appropriate (97).
Year
2020
Page
113
Section
A.2
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
1024 Annex 2
Tests for adventitious agents
Adventitious agents
NGS
Cell culture method

Original text

Each virus MS lot should also be tested in animals if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides a risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package (103). The animals used might include guinea-pigs, adult mice and suckling mice.

New text

A strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.
Year
2020
Page
119
Section
A.3.3.3.4

References

Biologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
1024 Annex 2
Tests in experimental animals
Miscellaneous

Original text

As outlined in Part B below, studies should, when relevant, be performed in animals to determine that the MS virus displays attenuating features which are maintained throughout subsequent vaccine process steps. For certain candidate vaccines it may be required to test at least once during nonclinical development for these features in a relevant animal model. For an MS virus to be identified as attenuated the criteria for determining attenuation should be clearly defined. The NRA may decide that such testing does not need to be repeated each time a new WS lot is derived.

New text

Keep original text
Year
2020
Page
120
Section
A.3.3.3.5
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
1024 Annex 2
Tests for adventitious agents
Adventitious agents
NGS
Cell culture method

Original text

Each recombinant baculovirus seed should be tested in cell cultures for adventitious agents appropriate to the origin and passage history of the seed baculovirus.

New text

A strategy for testing adventitious viruses in vaccines must be developed based on a risk assessment. Relevant culture methods and/or specific molecular biology or broad molecular methods should be part of the overall testing package with the agreement of the NRA. In vivo tests may only be used if the risk assessment indicates that this test provides an additional risk mitigation taking into account the overall testing package.
Year
2020
Page
124
Section
A.3.4.2.1.3

References

Biologicals 2020 Sep;67:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
"Gombold et al , 2014 “Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products”
Vaccine 2014 May 19;32(24):2916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Charlebois R. L. et al, 2020 . “Sensitivity and breadth of detection of high-throughput sequencing for adventitious virus detection”
npj Vaccines volume 5, Article number: 61 (2020) "
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines
1024 Annex 2
Genetic and phenotypic characterization
Miscellaneous

Original text

For replicating vectors, in vivo growth characteristics in a suitable animal model may also be informative and should be performed if justified.

New text

For replicating vectors, growth characteristics in a suitable model may also be informative and should be performed if justified.
Year
2020
Page
126
Section
A.3.5.1.1.2