349 results
WHO guideline title | Product | TRS | Test name | Test category | 3Rs approach | Toggle to view all updates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of recombinant malaria vaccines targeting the pre-erythrocytic and blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum |
Malaria vaccines
|
980 Annex 3
|
General safety test
|
GST
|
||
Original textEach final lot should be tested in mice or guinea-pigs to confirm the absence of abnormal toxicity using a test approved by the NRA. This test may not be required for routine lot release after the consistency of production has been established to the satisfaction of the NRA. New textThis needs to be removed as per WHO TRS 1016, 2019 page No 32-33
ReferencesBiologicals. 2020 Jul; 66: 17–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.05.003
|
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of recombinant malaria vaccines targeting the pre-erythrocytic and blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum |
Malaria vaccines
|
980 Annex 3
|
Pyrogen and endotoxin content
|
Pyrogenicity/endotooxin testing
|
MAT
rFC
|
|
Original textThe vaccine in the final container should be tested for pyrogenic activity through intravenous injection into rabbits. A Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) test may be used in lieu of the rabbit pyrogen test if it has been validated. Similarly, a suitably validated monocyte activation test may be considered as an alternative to the pyrogen test. New textThe need for pyrogenicity testing should be assessed during the manufacturing development process and be re-evaluated following any significant changes in the production process or relevant reported production inconsistencies that may influence pyrogenicity. A risk-based approach should be implemented which is suitable to the manufacturing process and the product depending on the potential presence of endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens. The endotoxin content of the final product should be determined using a suitable in vitro assay, such as the recombinant factor C (rFC) or limulus/tachypleus amoebocyte lysate (LAL/TAL) tests. The rFC method is strongly recommended due to concerns over the impact on the sustainability of limulus stocks. The endotoxin content should be consistent with levels found to be acceptable in final product lots used in clinical trials and within the limits agreed upon with the NRA. A monocyte activation test (MAT) may be used for pyrogen testing after a product-specific validation. The use of the rabbit pyrogen test should be avoided due to its inherent variability, high retesting rates, and interspecies differences in pyrogenic responses as compared to humans.ReferencesMAT:Schindler, S., von Aulock, S., Daneshian, M. and Hartung, T. (2009) “Development, validation and applications of the monocyte activation test for pyrogens based on human whole blood”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 26(4), pp. 265–277. doi: 10.14573/altex.2009.4.265.
rFC: Biotechniques 2021 May;70(5):290-300. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0165. Epub 2021 May 6.
|
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of recombinant malaria vaccines targeting the pre-erythrocytic and blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum |
Malaria vaccines
|
980 Annex 3
|
Yeast cells
|
Adventitious agents
|
||
Original textThe characteristics of the recombinant production strain (host cell in combination with the expression vector system) should be fully described, and information should be given about the absence of adventitious agents (35, 36) and gene homogeneity for the MCBs and WCBs. ....The MCB and WCB should be tested for the absence of adventitious agents according to Part A of WHO General requirements for the sterility of biological substances no. 6 (1973) (35) or by a method approved by the NRA. New textNeed to review text that is referred to.
|
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of recombinant malaria vaccines targeting the pre-erythrocytic and blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum |
Malaria vaccines
|
980 Annex 3
|
Bacterial endotoxins
|
Pyrogenicity/endotooxin testing
|
MAT
rFC
|
|
Original textEach final purified antigen bulk should be tested for bacterial endotoxins. The method and the concentration limits used should be approved by the NRA. New textThe need for pyrogenicity testing should be assessed during the manufacturing development process and be re-evaluated following any significant changes in the production process or relevant reported production inconsistencies that may influence pyrogenicity. A risk-based approach should be implemented which is suitable to the manufacturing process and the product depending on the potential presence of endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens. The endotoxin content of the final product should be determined using a suitable in vitro assay, such as the recombinant factor C (rFC) or limulus/tachypleus amoebocyte lysate (LAL/TAL) tests. The rFC method is strongly recommended due to concerns over the impact on the sustainability of limulus stocks. The endotoxin content should be consistent with levels found to be acceptable in final product lots used in clinical trials and within the limits agreed upon with the NRA. A monocyte activation test (MAT) may be used for pyrogen testing after a product-specific validation. The use of the rabbit pyrogen test should be avoided due to its inherent variability, high retesting rates, and interspecies differences in pyrogenic responses as compared to humans.ReferencesMAT:Schindler, S., von Aulock, S., Daneshian, M. and Hartung, T. (2009) “Development, validation and applications of the monocyte activation test for pyrogens based on human whole blood”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 26(4), pp. 265–277. doi: 10.14573/altex.2009.4.265.
rFC: Biotechniques 2021 May;70(5):290-300. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0165. Epub 2021 May 6.
|
||||||
Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of recombinant malaria vaccines targeting the pre-erythrocytic and blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum |
Malaria vaccines
|
980 Annex 3
|
Potency test
|
Potency
|
||
Original textIn vivo assay. New textUpdate to reflect new text
|
||||||
Guidelines for the production and quality control of synthetic peptide vaccines |
Synthetic peptide vaccines
|
889 Annex 1
|
Potency
|
Potency
|
||
Original textA suitable in vitro or in vivo assay for immunogenicity or antigenicity should therefore be concidered. New textIn vitro assays, such as monoclonal antibody ELISAs, are likely to be suitable for the routine testing of synthetic peptide vaccines. |
||||||
Guidelines for the production and quality control of synthetic peptide vaccines |
Synthetic peptide vaccines
|
889 Annex 1
|
Routine control
|
Pyrogenicity/endotooxin/GST
|
||
Original textThe product specification should also include tests to ensure that the final dosage form complies with the usual safety tests, such as pyrogenicity and sterility, appropriate to a parenteral preparation, together with tests of identity, antigen content and general innocuity. New textInnocuity test shoud be removed as per WHO TRS 1016, 2019 page No 32-33.
The need for pyrogenicity testing should be assessed during the manufacturing development process and be re-evaluated following any significant changes in the production process or relevant reported production inconsistencies that may influence pyrogenicity. A risk-based approach should be implemented which is suitable to the manufacturing process and the product depending on the potential presence of endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens.
The endotoxin content of the final product should be determined using a suitable in vitro assay, such as the recombinant factor C (rFC) or limulus/tachypleus amoebocyte lysate (LAL/TAL) tests. The rFC method is strongly recommended due to concerns over the impact on the sustainability of limulus stocks. The endotoxin content should be consistent with levels found to be acceptable in final product lots used in clinical trials and within the limits agreed upon with the NRA.
A monocyte activation test (MAT) may be used for pyrogen testing after a product-specific validation. The use of the rabbit pyrogen test should be avoided due to its inherent variability, high retesting rates, and interspecies differences in pyrogenic responses as compared to humans.
ReferencesGST: Biologicals. 2020 Jul; 66: 17–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.05.003
|
||||||
Requirements for human interferons prepared from lymphoblastoid cells |
Human interferons
|
786 Annex 3
|
Tests for pyrogenic substances
|
Pyrogenicity/endotooxin testing
|
MAT
rFC
|
|
Original textThe pyrogen content of the final bulk shall be determined by a method agreed with the NCA. New textThe need for pyrogenicity testing should be assessed during the manufacturing development process and be re-evaluated following any significant changes in the production process or relevant reported production inconsistencies that may influence pyrogenicity. A risk-based approach should be implemented which is suitable to the manufacturing process and the product depending on the potential presence of endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens. The endotoxin content of the final product should be determined using a suitable in vitro assay, such as the recombinant factor C (rFC) or limulus/tachypleus amoebocyte lysate (LAL/TAL) tests. The rFC method is strongly recommended due to concerns over the impact on the sustainability of limulus stocks. The endotoxin content should be consistent with levels found to be acceptable in final product lots used in clinical trials and within the limits agreed upon with the NRA. A monocyte activation test (MAT) may be used for pyrogen testing after a product-specific validation. The use of the rabbit pyrogen test should be avoided due to its inherent variability, high retesting rates, and interspecies differences in pyrogenic responses as compared to humans.ReferencesMAT:Schindler, S., von Aulock, S., Daneshian, M. and Hartung, T. (2009) “Development, validation and applications of the monocyte activation test for pyrogens based on human whole blood”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 26(4), pp. 265–277. doi: 10.14573/altex.2009.4.265.
rFC: Biotechniques 2021 May;70(5):290-300. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0165. Epub 2021 May 6.
|
||||||
Requirements for human interferons prepared from lymphoblastoid cells |
Human interferons
|
786 Annex 3
|
Innocuity test
|
GST
|
||
Original textThe innocuity of the final product shall be tested parenterally in guinea-pigs and mice by a method approved by the national control authority. New textThis needs to be removed as per WHO TRS 1016, 2019 page No 32-33
ReferencesBiologicals. 2020 Jul; 66: 17–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.05.003
|
||||||
Requirements for human interferons prepared from lymphoblastoid cells |
Human interferons
|
786 Annex 3
|
Tests for pyrogenic substances
|
Pyrogenicity/endotooxin testing
|
MAT
rFC
|
|
Original textEach final lot shall be tested for pyrogenic substanes by a method approved by the NCA New textThe need for pyrogenicity testing should be assessed during the manufacturing development process and be re-evaluated following any significant changes in the production process or relevant reported production inconsistencies that may influence pyrogenicity. A risk-based approach should be implemented which is suitable to the manufacturing process and the product depending on the potential presence of endotoxins and non-endotoxin pyrogens. The endotoxin content of the final product should be determined using a suitable in vitro assay, such as the recombinant factor C (rFC) or limulus/tachypleus amoebocyte lysate (LAL/TAL) tests. The rFC method is strongly recommended due to concerns over the impact on the sustainability of limulus stocks. The endotoxin content should be consistent with levels found to be acceptable in final product lots used in clinical trials and within the limits agreed upon with the NRA. A monocyte activation test (MAT) may be used for pyrogen testing after a product-specific validation. The use of the rabbit pyrogen test should be avoided due to its inherent variability, high retesting rates, and interspecies differences in pyrogenic responses as compared to humans.ReferencesMAT:Schindler, S., von Aulock, S., Daneshian, M. and Hartung, T. (2009) “Development, validation and applications of the monocyte activation test for pyrogens based on human whole blood”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 26(4), pp. 265–277. doi: 10.14573/altex.2009.4.265.
rFC: Biotechniques 2021 May;70(5):290-300. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0165. Epub 2021 May 6.
|